

Reggina 2-3 Inter and Anorthosis
By: Johonna | November 2nd, 2008
Any win is a good win but, geesh, what a nail-biter. Sure, for the first half hour, everything was peachy: Quaresma hits the upright, then Ibra fed a killer ball to Maicon who slotted it away nicely. The second goal came soon after from Vieira with an assist by Quaresma. Then we started piling on the defensive errors. Reggina was quick to capitalize (as well they should), and like a flash, our record of clean-sheets was broken. I knew it had to happen sooner or later, but it was still rough. I have no idea what Orandi said to the squad during the interval, but they came out fighting. In the 53rd minute Reggina equalize and Inter concede 2 goals for the first time this season.
The rest of the half was end-to-end with both squads pulling everything out for the winning goal. Then, in a last-ditch, do-or-die corner in stoppage time, the ball falls at Cordoba’s feet and he blasts it past Campagnolo. Reggina played a great game (and we were not at our defensive best) and they probably deserved the draw, but I will so take the three points. If Ivan were here, I would plant a sloppy one right on his lips! Highlights after the jump.
But there is a dark cloud for our silver lining. Chivu is injured – badly:
The Romanian defender has injured the internal collateral ligament in his left knee. He will undergo conservative therapy instead of surgery, and will begin a rehabilitation programme in the coming days.
C4 thinks he will be our for at least a month. Man, can we not make it through 1 match without loosing a player? What do you bet that Chivu does not see the pitch until after the winter break? Poor guy, and after just getting over the shoulder injury.
But that is the past, and due to the breakneck pace of top-flight football, we must move on.
Anorthosis v Inter, Champions League Matchday 4
Mou has called up 21 for our trip to Nicosia. It looks like Cruz in back in favor while Adriano is still on the outs:
Goalkeepers: Toldo, Julio Cesar, Orlandoni.
Defenders: Cordoba, Maxwell, Maicon, Burdisso, Materazzi, Santon.
Midfielders: Zanetti, Stankovic, Vieira, Cambiasso, Mancini, Bolzoni, Tremolada, Quaresma.
Strikers: Ibrahimovic, Cruz, Destro, Balotelli.
Inter’s Primavera squad have been doing well, and clearly a couple have caught the eye of Mourinho. Monday will see 2 youth players traveling with the team, Tremolada and Destro, along with newly promoted Santon and Bolzoni. I wonder if any of them will see the pitch.
There is not much to say about this match-up that wasn’t already said when they came to Milan. They are still a tough team with tons of talent only this time we will not have Muntari to help out in the midfield. Luckily, though, Cambiasso is ready to play.
Anorthosis had been on quite a run – unbeaten in 39 league games – but this Monday AC Omonia beat them 4-0. According to Ketsbaia:
We didn’t mark our opponents properly and conceded three sloppy goals from mistakes. The game was finished from then on.
Hopefully Mou and the boys have watched film of this game so we can take advantage of these holes. Everyone is tired and the string of away games may be beginning to take their toll (Capitano definitely needs a rest). We need every advantage we can find.
NUTS AND BOLTS:
When: Nov 4, 8:45 CET (11:45am Pacific, 2:45pm Eastern, 3:45pm for Kirby);
Where: Nicosia, Cyprus
Referee: Laurent Duhamel, France
How to Watch: Streaming or pay-per-view (live and replay).
So what do you say? Inter 2 – 0 Anorthosis
FORZA INTER
I thought I would add the obligatory Keeper photo. This one is from the press conference today. They sure look confident…

| Serie A Match Schedule | Discount Travel to Milan | |||
| Inter Milan Results | San Siro information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Kirby, it looks like your response to Lamagica was caught by the spam filter – I dont think it liked your choice of curse words. Since we are putting this all behind us, I am not going to restore the message.
Lets just all move on, shall we?
Posted from
United States

-



Wow. Anyone got any thoughts about Udinese? lol. This is the Inter blog right? I never understood why people resort to personal attacks. Whatever makes you feel good I guess.
Has there been official word on Chivu? Is Cambiasso fit? Is Adri gonna be in the squad? Is Nico gonna get the axe? Anyone? Please!
Posted from
United States

-



I just read that Samuel went 90 min in a reserve match! Great news. Hopefully Materazzi can hold up until he’s match fit and then we’ll have the dominant pairing of Samu and Cordoba. Thats the CB pair we need to make a run in the CL.
Posted from
United States

-



yeah sorry about that joey…i actually forgot that i was on a public forum and not on msn. i humbly apologize for my actions and hope that you and anyone i have offended can forgive me (this is a serious apology and not sarcasm).
Posted from
United States

-



I have been a bad blogger. Sorry there was no recap for the CL game. There will be a preview for Udinese.
I wonder about Samuel. Should it really take a year to come back from injury? Or is there something more there?
Posted from
United States

-



Looks like Adriano will be back soon. I hope. He played 90 minutes of that friendly.
Posted from
United States

-



Lol….Gee mad for someone who finds me irrelevant, you sure spend alot of time responding to my posts…especially considering its your busy season Chalk that up to yet another one of your contradictions
Keep avoiding the simple formula that YOU endorsed – you play bad in other games = you don’t deserve to win future games. It’s a rediculous proposition but one you endorse. Given that endorsement, inter will not be deserving of winning any future games since they are playing like shit recently. That was your basic argument so in turn that is inherently your position on inter.
You care mad, you care. Even during your busy season. LOL
Posted from
Canada

-



Who do you support, lamagica?
Posted from
United States

-



he supports roma…of course
Posted from
United States

-



Thanks for the link Jo.
If Messi was ever to come to Serie A, he would most likely go to Milan… when he is 30 and has already become a Barca legend. Sorta similar to this whole “which player our stadium is named after” debate thats been going on. We all know how Milan loves to buy players for jersey sales. I could see Messi becoming part of the Milan business strategy.
Posted from
United States

-



“That was your basic argument so in turn that is inherently your position on inter.”
Nope. Still wrong.
“Keep avoiding the simple formula that YOU endorsed – you play bad in other games = you don’t deserve to win future games.”
Still wrong. I didn’t endorse that at all. My formula included winning. But it is really, seriously funny watching you keep getting that wrong. I never care how a team plays when it wins. You were the one who kept thinking that Inter didn’t deserve to win because you didn’t like the way they played last season, even though you had previously stated that all wins are deserved, hypocrite.
“It’s a rediculous proposition but one you endorse.”
It may even be “ridiculous”. But if it is then it should be easy to disprove. Even if you haven’t yet. Are you trying to tell me that you can’t disprove a ridiculous proposition? Tells me a lot.
“Lol….Gee mad for someone who finds me irrelevant, you sure spend alot of time responding to my posts…”
See this is why I respond. The time stamp on my posts are from 9:58 through 10:26. I spent a grand total of 28 minutes on three posts. Shall I count up the time/number of posts that you devoted to me in the last few days? You came here to re-start a “discussion” from a month or so ago!
That 28 minutes translates to the time it took me to eat dinner. That was all the time I devoted to you. 28 minutes to laugh at the second inadvertently funniest member of this “blog-o-sphere”. That constitutes as a lot of time? Plus, look at all the extra giggles I get.
It’s a bargain, sunshine!
“especially considering its your busy season”
I always make time for pleasure. Besides 28 minutes for the “best medicine”? Pshaw! All work, no making fun of the really pathetic, makes MAD dull and low on his daily recommended requirement of riboflavin.
“Chalk that up to yet another one of your contradictions”
Not sure why. I make time for my wife, my dogs, my hobbies and my guilty pleasures during all the seasons. Why would that be a contradiction again? Oh, that’s right… no dictionary. Make that list for Sandy, I am sure that he will come through for you.
Anyway, I look forward for the next truly enlightening post. I know that you won’t let me down.
Posted from
United States

-



Poop. Messi is from Argentina. Inter is all about Argentinians. If the world was fair and right, he would play for us. Besides, Milan is evil. And I only say that because I have just gotten back from a wine-maker’s night at one of my fav local restaurants and have probably had one glass too many.
Ok, I was going to be good and not drink too much, but hey, that did not work out too well. Sooo, Udinese preview tomorrow.
sorry. I suck. but the wine was really really good.
Posted from
United States

-



Messi will definitely play for us when he leaves Barca. His dad said in an interview he would play for us or Juve, the clubs he liked as a kid. Plus, we have more $$$ than Milan and Juve. We don’t base our plans on selling shirts, only winning titles.
Posted from
United States

-



seems like inter are interrested in renato augusto . is he any good??
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=951367Posted from
Singapore

-



mad with another marathon post – carefully broken down into specific sections…you rule! i’m getting the feeling you have a bit of a man-crush on me, despite all the ‘nasty’ things you say about me…lol. i’m flattered, buddy.
here’s the enlightening post you were after. make sure you dont draw the blinds again when reading it.
sorry, but i never said anything about inter not deserving to win. i am actually advocating the opposite….but not just for inter, for ALL teams. inter was used as an example and plugged into johanna’s very specific ‘formula’. problem is, you didnt like the truthful output that johanna’s ‘formula’ yielded. if you spent your time actually reading the original post rather than looking at ways to ellude rational, concise thought, you’d see that i was pointing out that the premise that johanna posted – a team doesnt deserve to win CURRENT games, even if they outplay their opposition, because of bad games played IN THE PAST – is a rediculous notion and the very pertinent inter example of last year (and clearly the last 4-5 games this year) was served to DISCREDIT that notion…NOT inter’s achievements. there was no qualifying statement of whether the previous games included wins, draws or losses, just ‘based on their play’. i dismiss that notion as rediculous because (and let me spell it out for you here) i am of the belief that if you outplay a team in a game, you deserve to win that game, period. previous games are irrelevant because they award the points based on the game you actually play. further, johanna’s premise precludes a team from ‘deserving’ to win the game if they played bad…even if they actually manage to win. hence, if inter (an example) wins a game yet plays like shit, they did not deserve to win. those are not MY words, that is the crux of the position put forward by johanna.
you barged into the conversation defending a fellow interista blindly. you clearly outright defended and endorsed johanna’s notion and THAT’s when i pointed out that, according to that specific notion (which, again, i think is rediculous), inter would not be ‘deserving’ of having won any of their games in the last 1/3 of the season and ultimately the scudetto because of their poor play (and a 13 point collapse is solid proof of the poor play, despite you likely wanting to come back with your subjective opinion of how they played even though virtually the rest of the footballing world would claim it was bad play). refering back again to johanna’s original comment, there is no mention of ‘bad wins’, ‘grinding out results’, etc. the only criteria was ‘bad play’. now you’ve since added YOUR qualifying statement that you “include wins”. that issue was never on the table at the time. what was once an unconditional endorsement (the posts are still there for you to read on the udinese blog), is now conveniently a ‘loose endorsement’ with a series of convoluted qualifying statements. we both know why you’ve chosen to go down that road.
Posted from
Canada

-



Dave: “we dont base our plans on selling shirts, only winning tittles”
Ok, now come on lad. You have won 3 tittles recently. These are recent plans that have just recently been fullfiled. You werent excactly dominant in the late 80’s and throughout the 90’s (when Messi was actualy living and breathing)
Even though i hate Inter, i would much rather see him (Messi) play for you guys, it would be great for Calcio, as long as he does not arrive when he is 30+. We kinda have a reputation for creating a old folks home in Serie A.
I am a realist, Messi + Roma = Pipedream. Never gonna happen.
Posted from
United States

-



It was a dig at Milan, Samson.
Posted from
United States

-



As alessio pointed out, it was a dig at Milan.
And as an Inter fan I know all too well our “plans” have only recently come to fruition. However, we have never lacked ambition and have always aimed for the big trophies, successful or not.
Milan want to cash in on celebrity because they need to completely overhaul their ageing squad and dont have the means to do so.
Posted from
United States

-



I understand that it was a dig at Milan but Milan has sold shirts and has a very good history as well. Recently they have just wanted to milk the value of their name for all its worth.
Im not arguing in defence Roma.
Posted from
United States

-



“these are recent plans that have just recently been fulfilled”
You implied that Inter lacked ambition in the 80’s and 90’s, which isnt true. We weren’t as successful as now, but the goals were always the same.
Posted from
United States

-



“mad with another marathon post – carefully broken down into specific sections…you rule! i’m getting the feeling you have a bit of a man-crush on me, despite all the ‘nasty’ things you say about me…lol.”
I haven’t said anything “nasty”. Just the truth. Your only function here is as my joke.
Btw, here is Johonna’s original post. I included everything just for shit’s and giggles:
Johonna | October 25th, 2008 at 11:30 pm
No brainfart.
Udinese have been playing stupendous football. It has been fun to watch and very successful. Roma have not. Roma fans complain about small budgets… Well try being Udinese. I think they are a great team with great players, hence, I believe they deserve to win… in a cosmic sense.
Besides, shouldn’t this be the one place on the Offside where it is appropriate to voice this opinion?”Here’s what you said that she said:
“i was pointing out that the premise that johanna posted – a team doesnt deserve to win CURRENT games, even if they outplay their opposition, because of bad games played IN THE PAST – is a rediculous notion”
Doesn’t quite look the same does it. She makes a simple statement, that happens to have a lot of truth in it and you go nuts on it because she dared speak against the RomaLosers. Btw, she was completely right.
God that was funny…
Udinese was WINNING, playing great, attractive football on a small budget. Roma, was LOSING despite a much bigger budget. Doesn’t sound “rediculous” [sic] to me.
“you barged into the conversation defending a fellow interista blindly”
Just for the record, here’s my “barging” in:
MAD | October 26th, 2008 at 9:04 am
Not new at all. If you are in bad form, you deserve to lose. That’s what you get for bad form.
Udinese has been playing great, they represent sane football management for clubs not the big 3.
They deserve a spot in the upper half (or upper five as the case may be) more than a team that has shat away all its opportunities thus far in the season.Doesn’t sound too confusing to me. I agree/d with her and I still do.
But the really funny part id the way that you keep treating your own opinions like gospel. I don’t care whether or not you agree with me, but goddam is it fun poking you with a “stick” to make you respond.
And the best part is that you keep getting the arguments wrong. After all this time, you still have no idea what Johonna or I were saying. The proof is just above here. It’s great.
That was my first post in all this. Losing teams are in bad form. Good teams win, and you know they are good teams because they win. I repeat it here:
“If Udinese’s form has been good then they deserve to beat a team that has stunk up the joint, like Roma has. I have no problems with that. All that tells us is that a good team has beaten a bad team, which means that the result is expected. And probably earned.”
Simple. Oh, by the way… it’s also exactly what happened!
“inter would not be ‘deserving’ of having won any of their games in the last 1/3 of the season and ultimately the scudetto because of their poor play”
First of all, a team can’t be playing poorly if they win over time, in my opinion. Here’s Inter form in the last third of last season (11 games) : WDLDWWWWLDW.
So our poor form and “collapse” was 6 wins 3 draws and 2 losses? This is poor form? I disagree.
Quick, who am I: 2 wins, 1 draw and 6 losses? This is poor form. Note the losses.
And just because it’s too, too much fun:
Here’s statement 1: “sorry, but i never said anything about inter not deserving to win.”
Here’s statement 2: “if they win and outplay a team it’ a deserved win”
Here’s statement 3: “yeah, mad, then you’d concur that inter dont deserve their first 5-6 victories this season then…or last year’s scudetto for that matter.”
For the record… I didn’t/don’t AGREE with you that Inter don’t deserve their wins and honors.
See, you did say it. And you did contradict yourself. And you are a hypocrite.
Posted from
United States

-



beautiful selective editing there mad. nice try. here is the ACTUAL first post:
Johonna | October 25th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
As much as I would like to see Udinese beat Roma (and I really really REALLY would), I will be rooting for a draw. Udinese dont need three more points and Roma doesnt deserve them.
followed by:
Samson | October 25th, 2008 at 10:20 pm
Roma does not deserve the win? was the game played yesterday or something? Johonna that was a true brainfart buttercup.
Posted from United Statesfollowed by:
Johonna | October 25th, 2008 at 11:30 pm
No brainfart.
Udinese have been playing stupendous football. It has been fun to watch and very successful. Roma have not. Roma fans complain about small budgets… Well try being Udinese. I think they are a great team with great players, hence, I believe they deserve to win… in a cosmic sense.
Besides, shouldn’t this be the one place on the Offside where it is appropriate to voice this opinion?
Posted from United Statesfollowed by:
lamagica | October 26th, 2008 at 7:39 am
hmmm, that’s a new concept. teams ‘deserve’ to win based on games played against other teams rather than against the opponent in question. i guess juve didnt ‘deserve’ to win against torino yesterday even though they outplayed torino. yes, brilliant concept…. for the confused.
good luck to udinese today. a solid, hard-working team whom i’ve always respected. also, good write-up, vin.
forza roma.
Posted from Italyso, This is the context by which the discussion began. it is pretty clear now that all the rest of the convoluted, tangential talk you’ve put forward has nothing to do with this simple comment and position put forward by johanna. udinese ‘deserved’ to win based only on previous merit AGAInST DIFFERENT OPPOSITION. if udinese had shat the bed in the game against roma, her premise suggests that they would still be deserving of that victory even if roma had outplayed them. (to quote: “I think they are a great team with great players, hence, I believe they deserve to win… in a cosmic sense”. a ‘cosmic sense’….that is the criteria by which you say “Doesn’t sound too confusing to me.”
rather than being a prick and taking things out of context for your convenience, why dont you read this within the context it was made – that if you endorse johanna’s position then, “you’d concur that inter dont deserve their first 5-6 victories this season then…or last year’s scudetto for that matter.” just to place this now into the actual conversation (important point capitalised for your comprehension):
MAD | October 26th, 2008 at 9:04 am
Not new at all. IF YOU ARE IN BAD FORM, YOU DESERVE TO LOSE. That’s what you get for bad form.
Udinese has been playing great, they represent sane football management for clubs not the big 3.
They deserve a spot in the upper half (or upper five as the case may be) more than a team that has shat away all its opportunities thus far in the season.
Doesn’t sound too confusing to me.
Posted from Canadafollowed by:
lamagica | October 26th, 2008 at 11:08 am
yeah, mad, then you’d concur that inter dont deserve their first 5-6 victories this season then…or last year’s scudetto for that matter. now it makes MUCH more sense.
Posted from Italynow the implication in my comment (at least for those that can measure up to rational thought) see this comment not as a follow up to your capitalised comment, meaning if you believe position ‘x’, then statement ‘y’ would suggest this (the inter example). it was used to point out the flaw in that position johanna put forward and for the last time NOT discrediting what ACTUALLY happened.
maybe a little less of you tired anecdotes on ‘poking with a stick’, ‘you make me laugh’, etc. and maybe a little more thought and reasoning would serve you better. i’m not really sure why you insist with that shit. it is doing nothing to me. it may have worked for you when you were in the 7th grade and getting your ass kicked by third graders but it’s time you got past those insecurities.
Posted from
Canada

-



too much time boys on a convo that has become very very dull.
I gotta question for you all, Stan Collymore said on Setanta’s football show during the week that if you want to win a league youve got to have quality up the middle, ie. Quality main striker, quality main central midfielder, Quality main central defender and quality GK.
I was wondering, based on this equation, how does everyone rate the top clubs, lets say Milan, Inter, Juve, Roma, Fiorentina and Napoli. Im going to do my own write up of this on my own blog but was interested to hear what you all thought.
Posted from
Australia

-



“i’m not really sure why you insist with that shit. it is doing nothing to me. it may have worked for you when you were in the 7th grade and getting your ass kicked by third graders but it’s time you got past those insecurities.”
I don’t care what it does for you. I am only telling the truth. You make me laugh. And you continue to do so.
“if udinese had shat the bed in the game against roma, her premise suggests that they would still be deserving of that victory even if roma had outplayed them.”
Yup. Udinese is a good team that has been winning. They deserve to win against a team like Roma that has not. Good teams deserve to win. They have god players. They have a good system. They are successful.
“so, This is the context by which the discussion began. it is pretty clear now that all the rest of the convoluted, tangential talk you’ve put forward has nothing to do with this simple comment and position put forward by johanna”
Actually I have already shown that it has. Success of a good team is merited. A bad team is lucky to win. I have said that over and over. It agrees with everything that Johonna said… and everything I have said. You don’t agree… so what?
“rather than being a prick and taking things out of context for your convenience, why dont you read this within the context it was made – that if you endorse johanna’s position then, “you’d concur that inter dont deserve their first 5-6 victories this season then…or last year’s scudetto for that matter.” just to place this now into the actual conversation”
The context is that you hate Inter. The context you suggest doesn’t make sense, because if one embraces Johonna’s original statement as I have, then Inter deserves to win, because they are in good form. We have won most of our games. That’s how you know we are in good form. YOu don’t think so, not because you understand what we are saying, but because you hate Inter and wouldn’t give them credit no matter what. We know this.
“now the implication in my comment (at least for those that can measure up to rational thought) see this comment not as a follow up to your capitalised comment, meaning if you believe position ‘x’, then statement ‘y’ would suggest this (the inter example). it was used to point out the flaw in that position johanna put forward and for the last time NOT discrediting what ACTUALLY happened.”
The implication is that if I agreed with YOUR version of things, that is if I had been turned by for idiotic… but funny, version on things, I would AGREE WITH YOU that Inter didn’t deserve anything. But I don’t.
And you are still a hypocrite. And you still contradict yourself all over the place. And you are still making me laugh.
Don’t ever change sunshine!!
Btw, talk about selective editing:
KJ | October 27th, 2008 at 2:34 pm
lamagica, you are a pariah of theoffside…please stay @ the roma page where your fellow idiots talk about what factor lost the game for them. trust me, there is alot of info to discuss
Gianfranco | October 27th, 2008 at 11:47 am
Didnt deserve the scudetto Lamagica, and I am sure your boys did. No one ever deserves a title, there is not sense of entitlement to championships, you WIN/EARN a title and it doesnt matter how you get to the end, it only matters to be on top when you get there. Do you as a Roma fan really feel you “deserved” the title, what makes you think some other two bit club didnt deserve it!? It is INSANE to even read this stuff!!!! Then you talk about calls!? Come on man…
Looks like people who follow other teams don’t buy your bull shit!
Posted from
United States

-



Of course not mad. These are the same guys that are busy holding each others cyber dicks with you around here. I’d have very little trouble find posts from others that have some eerr…unfavourable opinions of you and the tripe you concoct. Hardly necessary or relevant to the discussion though.
Neither of those posts from those two extremely dim guys had anything to do with the original comment being discussed…then again it appears that neither were you.
Not surprised you would grasp at something like that to ’support’ your latest post which is once again full of stupid irrelevant anecdotes and little to no substance. Perfect approach for you given that you talk in circles and out of your ass. It gives me sincere pleasurePosted from
Canada

Read the rest of the comments
Comments are closed













